4.8 Article

Percolation transition in dynamical traffic network with evolving critical bottlenecks

出版社

NATL ACAD SCIENCES
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1419185112

关键词

emergence; percolation; traffic

资金

  1. National Basic Research Program of China [2012CB725404]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [61104144]
  3. Defense Threat Reduction Agency (DTRA), Office of Naval Research (ONR) [N62909-14-1-N019]
  4. United States-Israel Binational Science Foundation
  5. LINC [289447]
  6. Multiplex European projects [317532]
  7. German Research Foundation
  8. Israel Science Foundation
  9. ONR [N00014-14-1-0738]
  10. DTRA [HDTRA1-14-1-0017]
  11. National Science Foundation [CMMI 1125290]
  12. Div Of Civil, Mechanical, & Manufact Inn
  13. Directorate For Engineering [1125290] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A critical phenomenon is an intrinsic feature of traffic dynamics, during which transition between isolated local flows and global flows occurs. However, very little attention has been given to the question of how the local flows in the roads are organized collectively into a global city flow. Here we characterize this organization process of traffic as traffic percolation, where the giant cluster of local flows disintegrates when the second largest cluster reaches its maximum. We find in real-time data of city road traffic that global traffic is dynamically composed of clusters of local flows, which are connected by bottleneck links. This organization evolves during a day with different bottleneck links appearing in different hours, but similar in the same hours in different days. A small improvement of critical bottleneck roads is found to benefit significantly the global traffic, providing a method to improve city traffic with low cost. Our results may provide insights on the relation between traffic dynamics and percolation, which can be useful for efficient transportation, epidemic control, and emergency evacuation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据