4.8 Article

Carlactone is an endogenous biosynthetic precursor for strigolactones

出版社

NATL ACAD SCIENCES
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1314805111

关键词

cytochrome P450; phosphate deficiency

资金

  1. MEXT KAKENHI [24114010]
  2. Program for Promotion of Basic and Applied Research for Innovations in Bio-Oriented Industry
  3. JST, CREST
  4. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [24114010] Funding Source: KAKEN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Strigolactones (SLs) are a class of terpenoid plant hormones that regulate shoot branching as well as being known as root-derived signals for symbiosis and parasitism. SL has tricyclic-lactone (ABC-ring) and methyl butenolide (D-ring), and they are connected through an enol ether bridge. Recently, a putative biosynthetic intermediate called carlactone (CL), of which carbon skeleton is in part similar to those of SLs, was identified by biochemical analysis of three biosynthetic enzymes, DWARF27, CAROTENOID CLEAV-AGE DIOXYGENASE 7 (CCD7), and CCD8 in vitro. However, CL has never been identified from plant tissues, and the conversion of CL to SLs has not been proven in vivo. To address these questions, we chemically synthesized C-13-labeled CL. We show that C-13-labeled CL is converted to (-)-[C-13]-2'-epi-5-deoxystrigol ((-)-2'-epi-5DS) and [C-13]-orobanchol, endogenous SLs in rice, in the dwarf10 mutant, which is defective in CCD8. In addition, we successfully identified endogenous CL by using liquid chromatography-quadrupole/time-of-flight tandem mass spectrometry in rice and Arabidopsis. Furthermore, we determined the absolute stereochemistry of endogenous CL to be (11R)-configuration, which is the same as that of (-)-2'-epi-5DS at the corresponding position. Feeding experiments showed that only the (11R)-isomer of CL, but not the (11S)-isomer, was converted to (-)-2'-epi-5DS in vivo. Taken together, our data provide conclusive evidence that CL is an endogenous SL precursor that is stereospecifically recognized in the biosynthesis pathway.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据