4.8 Article

Guanylate binding proteins promote caspase-11-dependent pyroptosis in response to cytoplasmic LPS

出版社

NATL ACAD SCIENCES
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1321700111

关键词

interferon; cell death; immunity-related GTPases; Nos2

资金

  1. American Heart Association [12PRE10440003]
  2. National Institutes of Health [R21AI099823, R01AI103197]
  3. Southeast Regional Center of Excellence for Emerging Infections and Biodefense (SERCEB) [U54-AI-057157]
  4. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft [FOR729, GRK1045]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

IFN receptor signaling induces cell-autonomous immunity to infections with intracellular bacterial pathogens. Here, we demonstrate that IFN-inducible guanylate binding protein (Gbp) proteins stimulate caspase-11-dependent, cell-autonomous immunity in response to cytoplasmic LPS. Caspase-11-dependent pyroptosis is triggered in IFN-activated macrophages infected with the Gram-negative bacterial pathogen Legionella pneumophila. The rapid induction of pyroptosis in IFN-activated macrophages required a cluster of IFN-inducible Gbp proteins encoded on mouse chromosome 3 (Gbp(chr3)). Induction of pyroptosis in naive macrophages by infections with the cytosol-invading.sdhA L. pneumophila mutant was similarly dependent on Gbpchr3, suggesting that these Gbp proteins play a role in the detection of bacteria accessing the cytosol. Cytoplasmic LPS derived from Salmonella ssp. or Escherichia coli has recently been shown to trigger caspase-11 activation and pyroptosis, but the cytoplasmic sensor for LPS and components of the caspase-11 inflammasome are not yet defined. We found that the induction of caspase-11-dependent pyroptosis by cytoplasmic L. pneumophila-derived LPS required Gbp(chr3) proteins. Similarly, pyroptosis induced by cytoplasmic LPS isolated from Salmonella was diminished in Gbp(chr3)-deficient macrophages. These data suggest a role for Gbp(chr3) proteins in the detection of cytoplasmic LPS and the activation of the noncanonical inflammasome.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据