4.8 Article

Molecular architecture of mammalian nitric oxide synthases

出版社

NATL ACAD SCIENCES
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1413763111

关键词

heme; flavin; electron microscopy; conformational heterogeneity

资金

  1. Scripps Research Institute
  2. National Institutes of Health National Institute of General Medical Sciences Postdoctoral Fellowship [5F32GM095023]
  3. American Heart Association Predoctoral Fellowship [14PRE18870036]
  4. National Institute of General Medical Sciences [P41 GM103310]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

NOSs are homodimeric multidomain enzymes responsible for producing NO. In mammals, NO acts as an intercellular messenger in a variety of signaling reactions, as well as a cytotoxin in the innate immune response. Mammals possess three NOS isoforms-inducible, endothelial, and neuronal NOS-that are composed of an N-terminal oxidase domain and a C-terminal reductase domain. Calmodulin (CaM) activates NO synthesis by binding to the helical region connecting these two domains. Although crystal structures of isolated domains have been reported, no structure is available for full-length NOS. We used high-throughput single-particle EM to obtain the structures and higher-order domain organization of all three NOS holoenzymes. The structures of inducible, endothelial, and neuronal NOS with and without CaM bound are similar, consisting of a dimerized oxidase domain flanked by two separated reductase domains. NOS isoforms adopt many conformations enabled by three flexible linkers. These conformations represent snapshots of the continuous electron transfer pathway from the reductase domain to the oxidase domain, which reveal that only a single reductase domain participates in electron transfer at a time, and that CaM activates NOS by constraining rotational motions and by directly binding to the oxidase domain. Direct visualization of these large conformational changes induced during electron transfer provides significant insight into the molecular underpinnings governing NO formation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据