4.8 Article

The vertical occipital fasciculus: A century of controversy resolved by in vivo measurements

出版社

NATL ACAD SCIENCES
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1418503111

关键词

diffusion-weighted imaging; vertical occipital fasciculus; perpendicular fasciculus; quantitative T1

资金

  1. National Science Foundation (NSF) [BCS1228397]
  2. NIH [EY015000, 1 R01 EY 02391501 A1]
  3. NSF Graduate Research Fellowship
  4. NIH National Research Service Award [F32 EY022294]
  5. Division Of Behavioral and Cognitive Sci
  6. Direct For Social, Behav & Economic Scie [1228397] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The vertical occipital fasciculus (VOF) is the only major fiber bundle connecting dorsolateral and ventrolateral visual cortex. Only a handful of studies have examined the anatomy of the VOF or its role in cognition in the living human brain. Here, we trace the contentious history of the VOF, beginning with its original discovery in monkey by Wernicke (1881) and in human by Obersteiner (1888), to its disappearance from the literature, and recent reemergence a century later. We introduce an algorithm to identify the VOF in vivo using diffusion-weighted imaging and tractography, and show that the VOF can be found in every hemisphere (n = 74). Quantitative T1 measurements demonstrate that tissue properties, such as myelination, in the VOF differ from neighboring white-matter tracts. The terminations of the VOF are in consistent positions relative to cortical folding patterns in the dorsal and ventral visual streams. Recent findings demonstrate that these same anatomical locations also mark cytoarchitectonic and functional transitions in dorsal and ventral visual cortex. We conclude that the VOF is likely to serve a unique role in the communication of signals between regions on the ventral surface that are important for the perception of visual categories (e.g., words, faces, bodies, etc.) and regions on the dorsal surface involved in the control of eye movements, attention, and motion perception.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据