4.8 Article

RNA design rules from a massive open laboratory

出版社

NATL ACAD SCIENCES
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1313039111

关键词

RNA folding; citizen science; high-throughput experiments; crowdsourcing

资金

  1. National Science Foundation [EAGER (EArly-concept Grants for Exploratory Research)] [IIS-1043251]
  2. National Research Foundation of Korea [2011-0009963]
  3. Burroughs-Wellcome Foundation Career Award
  4. Keck Medical Research Foundation
  5. National Institutes of Health [R01 R01GM100953.]
  6. National Research Foundation of Korea [2011-0009963] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Self-assembling RNA molecules present compelling substrates for the rational interrogation and control of living systems. However, imperfect in silico models-even at the secondary structure level-hinder the design of new RNAs that function properly when synthesized. Here, we present a unique and potentially general approach to such empirical problems: the Massive Open Laboratory. The EteRNA project connects 37,000 enthusiasts to RNA design puzzles through an online interface. Uniquely, EteRNA participants not only manipulate simulated molecules but also control a remote experimental pipeline for high-throughput RNA synthesis and structure mapping. We show herein that the EteRNA community leveraged dozens of cycles of continuous wet laboratory feedback to learn strategies for solving in vitro RNA design problems on which automated methods fail. The top strategies-including several previously unrecognized negative design rules-were distilled by machine learning into an algorithm, EteRNABot. Over a rigorous 1-y testing phase, both the EteRNA community and EteRNABot significantly outperformed prior algorithms in a dozen RNA secondary structure design tests, including the creation of dendrimer-like structures and scaffolds for small molecule sensors. These results show that an online community can carry out large-scale experiments, hypothesis generation, and algorithm design to create practical advances in empirical science.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据