4.8 Article

Activity-dependent FUS dysregulation disrupts synaptic homeostasis

出版社

NATL ACAD SCIENCES
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1406162111

关键词

FUS; frontotemporal lobar degeneration; amyotrophic lateral sclerosis; metabotropic glutamate receptors; synaptic homeostasis

资金

  1. Alzheimer's Association
  2. Consortium for Frontotemporal Dementia Research
  3. Friends of the Alzheimer's Disease Center of UT Southwestern Medical Center
  4. National Institutes of Health
  5. National Natural Science Foundation of China
  6. Ministry of Science and Technology of China
  7. US Department of Veterans Affairs Biomedical Laboratory
  8. Muscular Dystrophy Association

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The RNA-binding protein fused-in-sarcoma (FUS) has been associated with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) and frontotemporal lobar degeneration (FTLD), two neurodegenerative disorders that share similar clinical and pathological features. Both missense mutations and overexpression of wild-type FUS protein can be pathogenic in human patients. To study the molecular and cellular basis by which FUS mutations and overexpression cause disease, we generated novel transgenic mice globally expressing low levels of human wild-type protein (FUSWT) and a pathological mutation (FUSR521G). FUSWT and FUSR521G mice that develop severe motor deficits also show neuroinflammation, denervated neuromuscular junctions, and premature death, phenocopying the human diseases. A portion of FUSR521G mice escape early lethality; these escapers have modest motor impairments and altered sociability, which correspond with a reduction of dendritic arbors and mature spines. Remarkably, only FUSR521G mice show dendritic defects; FUSWT mice do not. Activation of metabotropic glutamate receptors 1/5 in neocortical slices and isolated synaptoneurosomes increases endogenous mouse FUS and FUSWT protein levels but decreases the FUSR521G protein, providing a potential biochemical basis for the dendritic spine differences between FUSWT and FUSR521G mice.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据