4.8 Article

Persistence of skin-resident memory T cells within an epidermal niche

出版社

NATL ACAD SCIENCES
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1322292111

关键词

intravital imaging HSV-1 infection; Langerhans cells; Brownian motion

资金

  1. National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia
  2. Australian Research Council
  3. UK Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council Institute Strategic Programme grant
  4. European Research Council [280307:Epithelial_Immunol]
  5. BBSRC [BBS/E/B/000C0407, BBS/E/B/0000H119, BBS/E/B/0000S042] Funding Source: UKRI
  6. Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council [BBS/E/B/000C0407, BBS/E/B/0000H119, BBS/E/B/0000S042] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Barrier tissues such as the skin contain various populations of immune cells that contribute to protection from infections. These include recently identified tissue-resident memory T cells (T-RM). In the skin, these memory CD8(+) T cells reside in the epidermis after being recruited to this site by infection or inflammation. In this study, we demonstrate prolonged persistence of epidermal T-RM preferentially at the site of prior infection despite sustained migration. Computational simulation of T-RM migration within the skin over long periods revealed that the slow rate of random migration effectively constrains these memory cells within the region of skin in which they form. Notably, formation of T-RM involved a concomitant local reduction in dendritic epidermal gamma delta T-cell numbers in the epidermis, indicating that these populations persist in mutual exclusion and may compete for local survival signals. Accordingly, we show that expression of the aryl hydrocarbon receptor, a transcription factor important for dendritic epidermal gamma delta T-cell maintenance in skin, also contributes to the persistence of skin T-RM. Together, these data suggest that skin tissue-resident memory T cells persist within a tightly regulated epidermal T-cell niche.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据