4.8 Article

Measurement of histidine pKa values and tautomer populations in invisible protein states

出版社

NATL ACAD SCIENCES
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1400577111

关键词

conformationally excited protein states; Im7 protein-folding intermediate; chemical exchange; pH stability; CEST

资金

  1. National Science Foundation [OISE-0852964]
  2. Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR)
  3. CIHR

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The histidine imidazole side chain plays a critical role in protein function and stability. Its importance for catalysis is underscored by the fact that histidines are localized to active sites in similar to 50% of all enzymes. NMR spectroscopy has become an important tool for studies of histidine side chains through the measurement of site-specific pK(a)s and tautomer populations. To date, such studies have been confined to observable protein ground states; however, a complete understanding of the role of histidine electrostatics in protein function and stability requires that similar investigations be extended to rare, transiently formed conformers that populate the energy landscape, yet are often invisible in standard NMR spectra. Here we present NMR experiments and a simple strategy for studies of such conformationally excited states based on measurement of histidine C-13(gamma), C-13(delta 2) chemical shifts and H-1(epsilon)-C-13(epsilon) one-bond scalar couplings. The methodology is first validated and then used to obtain pK(a) values and tautomer distributions for histidine residues of an invisible on-pathway folding intermediate of the colicin E7 immunity protein. Our results imply that the side chains of H40 and H47 are exposed in the intermediate state and undergo significant conformational rearrangements during folding to the native structure. Further, the pK(a) values explain the pH-dependent stability differences between native and intermediate states over the pH range 5.5-6.5 and they suggest that imidazole deprotonation is not a barrier to the folding of this protein.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据