4.8 Article

Essential role for mammalian apurinic/apyrimidinic (AP) endonuclease Ape1/Ref-1 in telomere maintenance

出版社

NATL ACAD SCIENCES
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1304784110

关键词

genome stability; chromosome stability; endogenous DNA damage

资金

  1. Swiss National Science Foundation [PAOOA113188/1]
  2. Forschungsgesellschaft for Brain Tumors
  3. Unser Kind association for the conduct of scientific research in the field of neonatology and pediatric intensive care
  4. National Institutes of Health [GM040000]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The major mammalian apurinic/apyrimidinic endonuclease Ape1 is a multifunctional protein operating in protection of cells from oxidative stress via its DNA repair, redox, and transcription regulatory activities. The importance of Ape1 has beenmarked by previous work demonstrating its requirement for viability in mammalian cells. However, beyond a requirement for Ape1-dependent DNA repair activity, deeper molecular mechanisms of the fundamental role of Ape1 in cell survival have not been defined. Here, we report that Ape1 is an essential factor stabilizing telomeric DNA, and its deficiency is associated with telomere dysfunction and segrega-tion defects in immortalized cells maintaining telomeres by either the alternative lengthening of telomeres pathway (U2OS) or telomerase expression (BJ-hTERT), or in normal human fibroblasts (IMR90). Through the expression of Ape1 derivatives with site-specific changes, we found that the DNA repair and N-terminal acetylation domains are required for the Ape1 function at telomeres. Ape1 associates with telomere proteins in U2OS cells, and Ape1 depletion causes dissociation of TRF2 protein from telomeres. Consistent with this effect, we also observed that Ape1 depletion caused telomere shortening in both BJ-hTERT and in HeLa cells. Thus, our study describes a unique and unpredicted role for Ape1 in telomere protection, providing a direct link between base excision DNA repair activities and telomere metabolism.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据