4.8 Article

Aire-expressing thymic medullary epithelial cells originate from β5t-expressing progenitor cells

出版社

NATL ACAD SCIENCES
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1301799110

关键词

-

资金

  1. Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science, and Technology
  2. Japan Society for the Promotion of Science [23249025, 24111004]
  3. Strategic Japanese-Swiss Cooperative Program on Molecular Medical Research from Japan Science and Technology Agency
  4. Eidgenossiche Technische Hochschule Zurich
  5. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [23249025, 24111001, 24111004, 25860361] Funding Source: KAKEN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The thymus provides multiple microenvironments that are essential for the development and repertoire selection of T lymphocytes. The thymic cortex induces the generation and positive selection of T lymphocytes, whereas the thymic medulla establishes self-tolerance among the positively selected T lymphocytes. Cortical thymic epithelial cells (cTECs) and medullary TECs (mTECs) constitute the major stromal cells that structurally form and functionally characterize the cortex and the medulla, respectively. cTECs and mTECs are both derived from the endodermal epithelium of the third pharyngeal pouch. However, the molecular and cellular characteristics of the progenitor cells for the distinct TEC lineages are unclear. Here we report the preparation and characterization of mice that express the recombinase Cre instead of beta 5t, a proteasome subunit that is abundant in cTECs and not detected in other cell types, including mTECs. By crossing beta 5t-Cre knock-in mice with loxP-dependent GFP reporter mice, we found that beta 5t-Cre-mediated recombination occurs specifically in TECs but not in any other cell types in the mouse. Surprisingly, in addition to cTECs, beta 5t-Cre-loxP-mediated GFP expression was detected in almost all mTECs. These results indicate that the majority of mTECs, including autoimmune regulator-expressing mTECs, are derived from beta 5t-expressing progenitor cells.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据