期刊
PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
卷 110, 期 -, 页码 14081-14087出版社
NATL ACAD SCIENCES
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1212740110
关键词
analytic deliberation; climate change; environmental decision making; trust in science
资金
- Michigan AgBio Research
- Michigan State University Center for Systems Integration and Sustainability
- National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration's Climate Program Office through the Great Lakes Integrated Sciences and Assessments Center
Decisions always involve both facts and values, whereas most science communication focuses only on facts. If science communication is intended to inform decisions, it must be competent with regard to both facts and values. Public participation inevitably involves both facts and values. Research on public participation suggests that linking scientific analysis to public deliberation in an iterative process can help decision making deal effectively with both facts and values. Thus, linked analysis and deliberation can be an effective tool for science communication. However, challenges remain in conducting such process at the national and global scales, in enhancing trust, and in reconciling diverse values.
作者
我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。
推荐
暂无数据