4.8 Article

Pneumatic oscillator circuits for timing and control of integrated microfluidics

出版社

NATL ACAD SCIENCES
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1310254110

关键词

fluid dynamics; digital computing

资金

  1. National Science Foundation [ECCS-1102397]
  2. Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency Nanoelectromechanical/Microelectromechanical Science & Technology Fundamentals Program [N66001-1-4003]
  3. Div Of Electrical, Commun & Cyber Sys
  4. Directorate For Engineering [1102397] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Frequency references are fundamental to most digital systems, providing the basis for process synchronization, timing of outputs, and waveform synthesis. Recently, there has been growing interest in digital logic systems that are constructed out of microfluidics rather than electronics, as a possible means toward fully integrated laboratory-on-a-chip systems that do not require any external control apparatus. However, the full realization of this goal has not been possible due to the lack of on-chip frequency references, thus requiring timing signals to be provided from off-chip. Although microfluidic oscillators have been demonstrated, there have been no reported efforts to characterize, model, or optimize timing accuracy, which is the fundamental metric of a clock. Here, we report pneumatic ring oscillator circuits built from microfluidic valves and channels. Further, we present a compressible-flow analysis that differs fundamentally from conventional circuit theory, and we show the utility of this physically based model for the optimization of oscillator stability. Finally, we leverage microfluidic clocks to demonstrate circuits for the generation of phase-shiftedwaveforms, self-driving peristaltic pumps, and frequency division. Thus, pneumatic oscillators can serve as onchip frequency references formicrofluidic digital logic circuits. On-chip clocks and pumps both constitute critical building blocks on the path toward achieving autonomous laboratory-on-a-chip devices.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据