4.8 Article

Phase geometries of two-dimensional excitable waves govern self-organized morphodynamics of amoeboid cells

出版社

NATL ACAD SCIENCES
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1218025110

关键词

reaction-diffusion; oscillations; excitable media; self-organization; PTEN

资金

  1. Human Frontier Science Program [RGY 70/2008]
  2. Precursory Research for Embryonic Science and Technology (PRESTO)
  3. Japan Science and Technology Agency
  4. Uehara Memorial Foundation
  5. Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS) [23111506, 22680024]
  6. JST PRESTO
  7. Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology, Japan
  8. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [24115503, 22680024] Funding Source: KAKEN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In both randomly moving Dictyostelium and mammalian cells, phosphatidylinositol (3,4,5)-trisphosphate and F-actin are known to propagate as waves at the membrane and act to push out the protruding edge. To date, however, the relationship between the wave geometry and the patterns of amoeboid shape change remains elusive. Here, by using phase map analysis, we show that morphology dynamics of randomly moving Dictyostelium discoideum cells can be characterized by the number, topology, and position of spatial phase singularities, i.e., points that represent organizing centers of rotating waves. A single isolated singularity near the cellular edge induced a rotational protrusion, whereas a pair of singularities supported a symmetric extension. These singularities appeared by strong phase resetting due to de novo nucleation at the back of preexisting waves. Analysis of a theoretical model indicated excitability of the system that is governed by positive feedback from phosphatidylinositol (3,4,5)-trisphosphate to PI3-kinase activation, and we showed experimentally that this requires F-actin. Furthermore, by incorporating membrane deformation into the model, we demonstrated that geometries of competing waves explain most of the observed semiperiodic changes in amoeboid morphology.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据