4.8 Article

Functionally distinct Gata3/Chd4 complexes coordinately establish T helper 2 (Th2) cell identity

出版社

NATL ACAD SCIENCES
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1220865110

关键词

T helper 2 cell differentiation; transcriptional regulation

资金

  1. Global Center for Education and Research in Immune System Regulation and Treatment (Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science, and Technology, Japan)
  2. Takeda Science Foundation
  3. Sagawa Cancer Foundation
  4. Astellas Foundation for Research on Metabolic Disorders
  5. Naito Foundation Natural Science Scholarship
  6. Princess Takamatsu Cancer Research Foundation
  7. Ichiro Kanehara Foundation
  8. Uehara Memorial Foundation
  9. Mitsukoshi Health and Welfare Foundation Research Fund
  10. [17016010]
  11. [20012010]
  12. [221S0002]
  13. [24116506]
  14. [21390147]
  15. [22300325]
  16. [24390239]
  17. [19659121]
  18. [20790367]
  19. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [24390239, 24116506, 24790461, 221S0002, 23659240, 25670438, 22591093, 22300325, 23790523] Funding Source: KAKEN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

GATA binding protein 3 (Gata3) is a GATA family transcription factor that controls differentiation of naive CD4 T cells into T helper 2 (Th2) cells. However, it is unknown how Gata3 simultaneously activates Th2-specific genes while repressing those of other Th lineages. Here we show that chromodomain helicase DNA-binding protein 4 (Chd4) forms a complex with Gata3 in Th2 cells that both activates Th2 cytokine transcription and represses the Th1 cytokine IFN-gamma. We define a Gata3/Chd4/p300 transcriptional activation complex at the Th2 cytokine loci and a Gata3/Chd4-nucleosome remodeling histone deacetylase repression complex at the Tbx21 locus in Th2 cells. We also demonstrate a physiological role for Chd4 in Th2-dependent inflammation in an in vivo model of asthmatic inflammation. Thus, Gata3/Chd4 forms functionally distinct complexes, which mediate both positive and negative gene regulation to facilitate Th2 cell differentiation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据