4.8 Article

Keratins significantly contribute to cell stiffness and impact invasive behavior

出版社

NATL ACAD SCIENCES
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1310493110

关键词

cell mechanics; intermediate filaments; optical stretcher; Boyden chamber

资金

  1. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft [MA1316-9/3, MA1316-15, INST 268/230-1]
  2. German Federal Ministry of Education and Research (network EB)
  3. Translational Center for Regenerative Medicine, Translational Center for Regenerative Medicine, Leipzig [PTJ 0315883]
  4. ESF: European Social Foundation
  5. graduate school BuildMoNa: building with molecules and nano objects

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Cell motility and cell shape adaptations are crucial during wound healing, inflammation, and malignant progression. These processes require the remodeling of the keratin cytoskeleton to facilitate cell-cell and cell-matrix adhesion. However, the role of keratins for biomechanical properties and invasion of epithelial cells is only partially understood. In this study, we address this issue in murine keratinocytes lacking all keratins on genome engineering. In contrast to predictions, keratin-free cells show about 60% higher cell deformability even for small deformations. This response is compared with the less pronounced softening effects for actin depolymerization induced via latrunculin A. To relate these findings with functional consequences, we use invasion and 3D growth assays. These experiments reveal higher invasiveness of keratin-free cells. Reexpression of a small amount of the keratin pair K5/K14 in keratin-free cells reverses the above phenotype for the invasion but does not with respect to cell deformability. Our data show a unique role of keratins as major players of cell stiffness, influencing invasion with implications for epidermal homeostasis and pathogenesis. This study supports the view that down-regulation of keratins observed during epithelial-mesenchymal transition directly contributes to the migratory and invasive behavior of tumor cells.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据