4.8 Article

Prospective isolation of human embryonic stem cell-derived cardiovascular progenitors that integrate into human fetal heart tissue

出版社

NATL ACAD SCIENCES
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1220832110

关键词

engraftment; surface markers; Stem cells; mature cardiomyocytes; clonal analysis

资金

  1. California Institute for Regenerative Medicine [RCI 00354]
  2. National Institutes of Health/National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Fellowship [5T32 HL00708]
  3. American College of Cardiology/Pfizer Career Development Award
  4. Howard Hughes Medical Institute
  5. California Institute for Regenerative Medicine

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A goal of regenerative medicine is to identify cardiovascular progenitors from human ES cells (hESCs) that can functionally integrate into the human heart. Previous studies to evaluate the developmental potential of candidate hESC-derived progenitors have delivered these cells into murine and porcine cardiac tissue, with inconclusive evidence regarding the capacity of these human cells to physiologically engraft in xenotransplantation assays. Further, the potential of hESC-derived cardiovascular lineage cells to functionally couple to human myocardium remains untested and unknown. Here, we have prospectively identified a population of hESC-derived ROR2(+)/CD13(+)/KDR+/PDGFR alpha(+) cells that give rise to cardiomyocytes, endothelial cells, and vascular smooth muscle cells in vitro at a clonal level. We observed rare clusters of ROR2(+) cells and diffuse expression of KDR and PDGFR alpha in first-trimester human fetal hearts. We then developed an in vivo transplantation model by transplanting second-trimester human fetal heart tissues s.c. into the ear pinna of a SCID mouse. ROR2(+)/CD13(+)/KDR+/PDGFR alpha(+) cells were delivered into these functioning fetal heart tissues: in contrast to traditional murine heart models for cell transplantation, we show structural and functional integration of hESC-derived cardiovascular progenitors into human heart.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据