4.8 Article

Evolutionary mix-and-match with MFS transporters

出版社

NATL ACAD SCIENCES
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1303538110

关键词

membrane proteins; sequence analysis

资金

  1. National Institutes of Health [DK51131, DK069463, GM073210]
  2. National Science Foundation [MCB-1129551]
  3. Div Of Molecular and Cellular Bioscience
  4. Direct For Biological Sciences [1129551] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Major facilitator superfamily (MFS) transport proteins are ubiquitous in the membranes of all living cells, and similar to 25% of prokaryotic membrane transport proteins belong to this superfamily. The MFS represents the largest and most diverse group of transporters and includes members that are clinically important. A wide range of substrates is transported in many instances actively by transduction of the energy stored in an H+ electrochemical gradient into a concentration gradient of substrate. MFS transporters are characterized by a deep central hydrophilic cavity surrounded by 12 mostly irregular transmembrane helices. An alternating inverted triple-helix structural symmetry within the N- and C-terminal six-helix bundles suggests that the proteins arose by intragenic multiplication. However, despite similar features, MFS transporters share only weak sequence homology. Here, we show that rearrangement of the structural symmetry motifs in the Escherichia coli fucose permease (FucP) results in remarkable homology to lactose permease (LacY). The finding is supported by comparing the location of 34 point mutations in FucP to the location of mutants in LacY. Furthermore, in contrast to the conventional, linear sequence alignment, homologies between sugar- and H+-binding sites in the two proteins are observed. Thus, LacY and FucP likely evolved from primordial helix-triplets that formed functional transporters; however, the functional segments assembled in a different consecutive order. The idea suggests a simple, parsimonious chain of events that may have led to the enormous sequence diversity within the MFS.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据