4.8 Article

Substrate selectivity in glutamate-dependent acid resistance in enteric bacteria

出版社

NATL ACAD SCIENCES
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1301444110

关键词

transporter; reconstitution; proton pump

资金

  1. National Institutes of Health [R01-GM089688]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The bacterial antiporter GadC plays a central role in the glutamate (Glu)-dependent acid resistance system, which protects enteric bacteria against the extreme acidity of the human stomach. Upon acid shock, GadC imports Glu into the cytoplasm, where Glu decarboxylases consume a cytoplasmic proton, which ends up as a virtual proton in the decarboxylated product gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA) and is then exported via GadC. It was therefore proposed that GadC counters intracellular acidification by continually pumping out virtual protons. This scenario, however, is oversimplified. In gastric environments, GadC encounters substrates in multiple carboxyl protonation forms (outside: Glu(-), Glu(0), Glu(+); inside: GABA(0), GABA(+)). Of the six possible combinations of antiport partners, Glu(+)/GABA(0) results in proton influx, Glu(0)/GABA(0) and Glu(+)/GABA(+) are proton neutral, and Glu(-)/GABA(0), Glu(-)/GABA(+), or Glu(0)/GABA(+) lead to proton extrusion. Which of these exchanges does GadC catalyze? To attack this problem, we developed an oriented GadC liposome system holding a three-unit inward pH gradient to mimic the conditions facing bacteria in the stomach. By assessing the electrogenicity of substrate transport, we demonstrate that GadC selectively exchanges Glu(-) or Glu(0) with GABA(+), resulting in effective proton extrusion of >0.9 H+ per turnover to counter proton invasion into acid-challenged bacteria. We further show that GadC selects among protonated substrates using a charge-based mechanism, rather than directly recognizing the protonation status of the carboxyl groups. This result paves the way for future work to identify the molecular basis of GadC's substrate selectivity.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据