4.8 Article

Astrocyte pathology and the absence of non-cell autonomy in an induced pluripotent stem cell model of TDP-43 proteinopathy

出版社

NATL ACAD SCIENCES
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1300398110

关键词

glia; motor neuron disease; disease modeling

资金

  1. Euan MacDonald Centre
  2. Fidelity Foundation
  3. Motor Neurone Disease Association
  4. Medical Research Council
  5. Wellcome Trust
  6. Heaton-Ellis Trust
  7. ALS Association
  8. National Institutes of Neurological Disease and Stroke
  9. National Institutes on Aging
  10. National Institutes of Health [8DP1NS082099-06]
  11. MRC [MC_G1000733, G0300329, G0900688] Funding Source: UKRI
  12. Medical Research Council [G0300329, G0900688, MC_G1000733, G0700711B] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Glial proliferation and activation are associated with disease progression in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) and frontotemporal lobar dementia. In this study, we describe a unique platform to address the question of cell autonomy in transactive response DNA-binding protein (TDP-43) proteinopathies. We generated functional astroglia from human induced pluripotent stem cells carrying an ALS-causing TDP-43 mutation and show that mutant astrocytes exhibit increased levels of TDP-43, subcellular mislocalization of TDP-43, and decreased cell survival. We then performed coculture experiments to evaluate the effects of M337V astrocytes on the survival of wild-type and M337V TDP-43 motor neurons, showing that mutant TDP-43 astrocytes do not adversely affect survival of cocultured neurons. These observations reveal a significant and previously unrecognized glial cell-autonomous pathological phenotype associated with a pathogenic mutation in TDP-43 and show that TDP-43 proteinopathies do not display an astrocyte non-cell-autonomous component in cell culture, as previously described for SOD1 ALS. This study highlights the utility of induced pluripotent stem cell-based in vitro disease models to investigate mechanisms of disease in ALS and other TDP-43 proteinopathies.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据