4.8 Article

Maternal siRNAs as regulators of parental genome imbalance and gene expression in endosperm of Arabidopsis seeds

出版社

NATL ACAD SCIENCES
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1203094109

关键词

epigenetics; imprinting; polyploidy; reproduction; RNA interference

资金

  1. National Science Foundation [MCB1110957]
  2. Fulbright United States-United Kingdom Scholar Award
  3. Div Of Molecular and Cellular Bioscience
  4. Direct For Biological Sciences [1110957] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Seed size is important to crop domestication and natural selection and is affected by the balance of maternal and paternal genomes in endosperm. Endosperm, like placenta in mammals, provides reserves to the developing embryo. Interploidy crosses disrupt the genome balance in endosperm and alter seed size. Specifically, paternal-excess crosses (2 x 4) delay endosperm cellularization (EC) and produce larger seeds, whereas maternal-excess crosses (4 x 2) promote precocious EC and produce smaller seeds. The mechanisms for responding to the parental genome dosage imbalance and for gene expression changes in endosperm are unknown. In plants, RNA polymerase IV (PolIV or p4) encoded by NRPD1a is required for biogenesis of a major class of 24-nt small interfering RNAs (also known as p4-siRNAs), which are predominately expressed in developing endosperm. Here we show that p4-siRNA accumulation depends on the maternal genome dosage, and maternal p4-siRNAs target transposable elements (TEs) and TE-associated genes (TAGs) in seeds. The p4-siRNAs correlate negatively with expression levels of AGAMOUS-LIKE (AGL) genes in endosperm of interploidy crosses. Moreover, disruption of maternal NRPD1a expression is associated with p4-siRNA reduction and AGL up-regulation in endosperm of reciprocal crosses. This is unique genetic evidence for maternal siRNAs in response to parental genome imbalance and in control of transposons and gene expression during endosperm development.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据