4.8 Article

Magnetically sensitive light-induced reactions in cryptochrome are consistent with its proposed role as a magnetoreceptor

出版社

NATL ACAD SCIENCES
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1118959109

关键词

magnetic compass; magnetoreception; migratory birds; quantum biology; radical pair mechanism

资金

  1. Electromagnetic Fields Biological Research Trust
  2. Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency [QuBE: N66001-10-1-4061]
  3. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council
  4. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft [WE2376/41]
  5. Direct For Biological Sciences
  6. Div Of Molecular and Cellular Bioscience [1237986] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  7. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council [EP/D048559/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  8. EPSRC [EP/D048559/1] Funding Source: UKRI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Among the biological phenomena that fall within the emerging field of quantum biology is the suggestion that magnetically sensitive chemical reactions are responsible for the magnetic compass of migratory birds. It has been proposed that transient radical pairs are formed by photo-induced electron transfer reactions in cryptochrome proteins and that their coherent spin dynamics are influenced by the geomagnetic field leading to changes in the quantum yield of the signaling state of the protein. Despite a variety of supporting evidence, it is still not clear whether cryptochromes have the properties required to respond to magnetic interactions orders of magnitude weaker than the thermal energy, k(B)T. Here we demonstrate that the kinetics and quantum yields of photo-induced flavin-tryptophan radical pairs in cryptochrome are indeed magnetically sensitive. The mechanistic origin of the magnetic field effect is clarified, its dependence on the strength of the magnetic field measured, and the rates of relevant spin-dependent, spin-independent, and spin-decoherence processes determined. We argue that cryptochrome is fit for purpose as a chemical magnetoreceptor.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据