4.8 Article

Osmotic spreading of Bacillus subtilis biofilms driven by an extracellular matrix

出版社

NATL ACAD SCIENCES
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1109261108

关键词

collective motility; gel swelling; surface translocation; bacterial biofilm; polymeric secretion

资金

  1. European Community
  2. BASF Advanced Research Initiative, Harvard University
  3. National Science Foundation through the Harvard Materials Research Science and Engineering Center [DMR-0820484]
  4. Division of Mathematical Sciences [DMS-0907985]
  5. National Institutes of Health [GM58213]
  6. Direct For Mathematical & Physical Scien
  7. Division Of Materials Research [820484] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Bacterial biofilms are organized communities of cells living in association with surfaces. The hallmark of biofilm formation is the secretion of a polymeric matrix rich in sugars and proteins in the extracellular space. In Bacillus subtilis, secretion of the exopolysaccharide (EPS) component of the extracellular matrix is genetically coupled to the inhibition of flagella-mediated motility. The onset of this switch results in slow expansion of the biofilm on a substrate. Different strains have radically different capabilities in surface colonization: Flagella-null strains spread at the same rate as wild type, while both are dramatically faster than EPS mutants. Multiple functions have been attributed to the EPS, but none of these provides a physical mechanism for generating spreading. We propose that the secretion of EPS drives surface motility by generating osmotic pressure gradients in the extracellular space. A simple mathematical model based on the physics of polymer solutions shows quantitative agreement with experimental measurements of biofilm growth, thickening, and spreading. We discuss the implications of this osmotically driven type of surface motility for nutrient uptake that may elucidate the reduced fitness of the matrix-deficient mutant strains.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据