4.8 Article

Oncogene-specific activation of tyrosine kinase networks during prostate cancer progression

出版社

NATL ACAD SCIENCES
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1120985109

关键词

AKT; androgen receptor; ERG; K-RAS; bioinformatics

资金

  1. Department of Defense [PC101928, PC101008]
  2. UCLA
  3. US Department of Health and Human Services
  4. Ruth L. Kirschstein Institutional National Research Service [T32 CA009056]
  5. California Institute [TG2-01169]
  6. Specialized Program of Research Excellence (SPORE) in Prostate Cancer
  7. UCLA SPORE in Prostate Cancer
  8. CalTech UCLA Joint Center
  9. National Cancer Institute [1R01CA158627-01]
  10. Prostate Cancer Foundation
  11. Investigator of the Howard Hughes Medical Institute

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Dominant mutations or DNA amplification of tyrosine kinases are rare among the oncogenic alterations implicated in prostate cancer. We demonstrate that castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) in men exhibits increased tyrosine phosphorylation, raising the question of whether enhanced tyrosine kinase activity is observed in prostate cancer in the absence of specific tyrosine kinase mutation or DNA amplification. We generated a mouse model of prostate cancer progression using commonly perturbed non-tyrosine kinase oncogenes and pathways and detected a significant up-regulation of tyrosine phosphorylation at the carcinoma stage. Phosphotyrosine peptide enrichment and quantitative mass spectrometry identified oncogene-specific tyrosine kinase signatures, including activation of EGFR, ephrin type-A receptor 2 (EPHA2), and JAK2. Kinase: substrate relationship analysis of the phosphopeptides also revealed ABL1 and SRC tyrosine kinase activation. The observation of elevated tyrosine kinase signaling in advanced prostate cancer and identification of specific tyrosine kinase pathways from genetically defined tumor models point to unique therapeutic approaches using tyrosine kinase inhibitors for advanced prostate cancer.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据