4.1 Article

Fungal metabolites diversity in maize and associated human dietary exposures relate to micro-climatic patterns in Malawi

期刊

WORLD MYCOTOXIN JOURNAL
卷 8, 期 3, 页码 269-282

出版社

WAGENINGEN ACADEMIC PUBLISHERS
DOI: 10.3920/WMJ2014.1773

关键词

maize; fungal metabolites; micro-climatic; Malawi

资金

  1. Federal Country Lower Austria
  2. European regional development fund of the European Union
  3. Republic of Malawi (Ministry of Agriculture and Food Security)
  4. World Bank
  5. Norwegian Ministry of Foreign Affairs

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study investigated the diversity of fungal metabolites in maize across four agro-ecological zones of Malawi. A total of 90 maize samples (for human consumption), collected from farmsteads, were analysed for 235 fungal metabolites using liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. A total of 65 metabolites were found in the samples. 75% of samples from the hottest agro-ecological zone contained either aflatoxins, fumonisins, deoxynivalenol, zearalenone; or a combination thereof in levels exceeding European Union (EU) maximum levels, whereas the related fraction was only 17% in the cool temperature zone. Aflatoxins, citrinin, 3-nitropropionic acid, monocerin and equisetin were most prevalent and in higher levels in samples from hot agro-ecological zones, whereas deoxynivalenol, nivalenol, zearalenone and aurofusarin were most prevalent in cool agro-ecologies. On the basis of per-capita maize consumption, estimated daily intakes for all samples from hot ecologies were well above the JECEA's provisional maximum tolerable daily intake (PMTDI) of 2.0 mu g/kg body weight (bw)/day for fumonisins, whereas the PMTDI of 1.0 mu g/kg bw/day for deoxynivalenol was exceeded in relatively more (90%) samples from the cool highlands than the other zones. These results demonstrate the influence of micro-climatic conditions on mycotoxin prevalence patterns and underscores the need for development of agro-ecological specific mycotoxin dietary exposure management strategies.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据