4.8 Article

Growth-induced hormone dilution can explain the dynamics of plant root cell elongation

出版社

NATL ACAD SCIENCES
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1113632109

关键词

-

资金

  1. Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (BBSRC)
  2. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EPSRC)
  3. Royal Society
  4. Wolfson Foundation
  5. Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council [BB/D019613/1, REI20541, BB/G023972/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  6. BBSRC [BB/G023972/1, BB/D019613/1] Funding Source: UKRI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In the elongation zone of the Arabidopsis thaliana plant root, cells undergo rapid elongation, increasing their length by similar to 10-fold over 5 h while maintaining a constant radius. Although progress is being made in understanding how this growth is regulated, little consideration has been given as to howcell elongation affects the distribution of the key regulating hormones. Using a multiscale mathematical model and measurements of growth dynamics, we investigate the distribution of the hormone gibberellin in the root elongation zone. The model quantifies how rapid cell expansion causes gibberellin to dilute, creating a significant gradient in gibberellin levels. By incorporating the gibberellin signaling network, we simulate how gibberellin dilution affects the downstream components, including the growth-repressing DELLA proteins. We predict a gradient in DELLA that provides an explanation of the reduction in growth exhibited as cells move toward the end of the elongation zone. These results are validated at the molecular level by comparing predicted mRNA levels with transcriptomic data. To explore the dynamics further, we simulate perturbed systems in which gibberellin levels are reduced, considering both genetically modified and chemically treated roots. By modeling these cases, we predict how these perturbations affect gibberellin and DELLA levels and thereby provide insight into their altered growth dynamics.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据