4.8 Article

Highly localized sensitivity to climate forcing drives endemic cholera in a megacity

出版社

NATL ACAD SCIENCES
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1108438109

关键词

risk propagation; cholera and flooding; disease forecasting; inhomogeneous Markov chain; spatiotemporal dynamics of urban cholera

资金

  1. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration [F020704]
  2. Government of the People's Republic of Bangladesh
  3. Canadian International Development Agency
  4. Swedish International Development Cooperative Agency
  5. Department for International Development, United Kingdom
  6. Science and Technology Directorate, Department of Homeland Security
  7. Fogarty International Center, National Institutes of Health

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The population dynamics of endemic cholera in urban environments-in particular interannual variation in the size and distribution of seasonal outbreaks-remain poorly understood and highly unpredictable. In part, this situation is due to the considerable demographic, socioeconomic, and environmental heterogeneity of large and growing urban centers. Despite this heterogeneity, the influence of climate variability on the population dynamics of infectious diseases is considered a large-scale, regional, phenomenon, and as such has been previously addressed for cholera only with temporal models that do not incorporate spatial structure. Here we show that a probabilistic spatial model can explain cholera dynamics in the megacity of Dhaka, Bangladesh, and afford a basis for cholera forecasts at lead times of 11 mo. Critically, we find that the action of climate variability (El Nino southern oscillation and flooding) is quite localized: There is a climate-sensitive urban core that acts to propagate risk to the rest of the city. The modeling framework presented here should be applicable to cholera in other cities, as well as to other infectious diseases in urban settings and other biological systems with spatiotemporal interactions.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据