4.8 Article

The take-it-or-leave-it option allows small penalties to overcome social dilemmas

出版社

NATL ACAD SCIENCES
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1115219109

关键词

punishment; rewards; public goods; social contract; evolutionary games

资金

  1. Austrian Science Fund [TECT I-106 G11]
  2. European Commission
  3. European Science Foundation
  4. Austrian Ministry of Science and Research
  5. Vienna Science and Technology Fund
  6. [TECT I-104 G1]
  7. Austrian Science Fund (FWF) [I 106] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Self-interest frequently causes individuals engaged in joint enterprises to choose actions that are counterproductive. Free-riders can invade a society of cooperators, causing a tragedy of the commons. Such social dilemmas can be overcome by positive or negative incentives. Even though an incentive-providing institution may protect a cooperative society from invasion by free-riders, it cannot always convert a society of free-riders to cooperation. In the latter case, both norms, cooperation and defection, are stable: To avoid a collapse to full defection, cooperators must be sufficiently numerous initially. A society of free-riders is then caught in a social trap, and the institution is unable to provide an escape, except at a high, possibly prohibitive cost. Here, we analyze the interplay of (a) incentives provided by institutions and (b) the effects of voluntary participation. We show that this combination fundamentally improves the efficiency of incentives. In particular, optional participation allows institutions punishing free-riders to overcome the social dilemma at a much lower cost, and to promote a globally stable regime of cooperation. This removes the social trap and implies that whenever a society of cooperators cannot be invaded by free-riders, it will necessarily become established in the long run, through social learning, irrespective of the initial number of cooperators. We also demonstrate that punishing provides a lighter touch than rewarding, guaranteeing full cooperation at considerably lower cost.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据