4.8 Article

Soluble oligomerization provides a beneficial fitness effect on destabilizing mutations

出版社

NATL ACAD SCIENCES
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1118157109

关键词

fitness landscape; genotype-phenotype relation; molecular evolution; protein solubility; protein aggregation

资金

  1. National Institutes of Health [GM 068670]
  2. Human Frontier Science Program

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Mutations create the genetic diversity on which selective pressures can act, yet also create structural instability in proteins. How, then, is it possible for organisms to ameliorate mutation-induced perturbations of protein stability while maintaining biological fitness and gaining a selective advantage? Here we used site-specific chromosomal mutagenesis to introduce a selected set of mostly destabilizing mutations into folA-an essential chromosomal gene of Escherichia coli encoding dihydrofolate reductase (DHFR)-to determine how changes in protein stability, activity, and abundance affect fitness. In total, 27 E. coli strains carrying mutant DHFR were created. We found no significant correlation between protein stability and its catalytic activity nor between catalytic activity and fitness in a limited range of variation of catalytic activity observed in mutants. The stability of these mutants is strongly correlated with their intracellular abundance, suggesting that protein homeo-static machinery plays an active role in maintaining intracellular concentrations of proteins. Fitness also shows a significant correlation with intracellular abundance of soluble DHFR in cells growing at 30 degrees C. At 42 degrees C, the picture was mixed, yet remarkable: A few strains carrying mutant DHFR proteins aggregated, rendering them nonviable, but, intriguingly, the majority exhibited fitness higher than wild type. We found that mutational destabilization of DHFR proteins in E. coli is counterbalanced at 42 degrees C by their soluble oligomerization, thereby restoring structural stability and protecting against aggregation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据