4.8 Article

Comparing the mechanism of water condensation and evaporation in glassy aerosol

出版社

NATL ACAD SCIENCES
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1200691109

关键词

water uptake; whispering gallery modes; Raman spectroscopy; optical tweezers; viscous aerosol

资金

  1. EPSRC
  2. ETH [ETH-0210-1]
  3. EPSRC [EP/G007713/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  4. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council [EP/G007713/1] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Atmospheric models generally assume that aerosol particles are in equilibrium with the surrounding gas phase. However, recent observations that secondary organic aerosols can exist in a glassy state have highlighted the need to more fully understand the kinetic limitations that may control water partitioning in ambient particles. Here, we explore the influence of slow water diffusion in the condensed aerosol phase on the rates of both condensation and evaporation, demonstrating that significant inhibition in mass transfer occurs for ultraviscous aerosol, not just for glassy aerosol. Using coarse mode (3-4 um radius) ternary sucrose/sodium chloride/aqueous droplets as a proxy for multicomponent ambient aerosol, we demonstrate that the timescale for particle equilibration correlates with bulk viscosity and can be >> 10(3) s. Extrapolation of these timescales to particle sizes in the accumulation mode (e. g., approximately 100 nm) by applying the Stokes-Einstein equation suggests that the kinetic limitations imposed on mass transfer of water by slow bulk phase diffusion must be more fully investigated for atmospheric aerosol. Measurements have been made on particles covering a range in dynamic viscosity from <0.1 to >10(13) Pa s. We also retrieve the radial inhomogeneities apparent in particle composition during condensation and evaporation and contrast the dynamics of slow dissolution of a viscous core into a labile shell during condensation with the slow percolation of water during evaporation through a more homogeneous viscous particle bulk.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据