4.8 Article

ADAR1 promotes malignant progenitor reprogramming in chronic myeloid leukemia

出版社

NATL ACAD SCIENCES
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1213021110

关键词

-

资金

  1. California Institute for Regenerative Medicine (CIRM) [RN2-00910-1, DR1-01430]
  2. CIRM Training Grant [TG2-01154]
  3. CIRM Scientific Excellence through Exploration and Development (SEED) [RS1-00228-1]
  4. Cancer Stem Cell Consortium
  5. Government of Canada through Genome Canada
  6. Ontario Genomics Institute [OGI-047]
  7. Canadian Institutes of Health Research [CSC-105367]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The molecular etiology of human progenitor reprogramming into self-renewing leukemia stem cells (LSC) has remained elusive. Although DNA sequencing has uncovered spliceosome gene mutations that promote alternative splicing and portend leukemic transformation, isoform diversity also may be generated by RNA editing mediated by adenosine deaminase acting on RNA (ADAR) enzymes that regulate stem cell maintenance. In this study, whole-transcriptome sequencing of normal, chronic phase, and serially transplantable blast crisis chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) progenitors revealed increased IFN-gamma pathway gene expression in concert with BCR-ABL amplification, enhanced expression of the IFN-responsive ADAR1 p150 isoform, and a propensity for increased adenosine-to-inosine RNA editing during CML progression. Lentiviral overexpression experiments demonstrate that ADAR1 p150 promotes expression of the myeloid transcription factor PU.1 and induces malignant reprogramming of myeloid progenitors. Moreover, enforced ADAR1 p150 expression was associated with production of a misspliced form of GSK3 beta implicated in LSC self-renewal. Finally, functional serial transplantation and shRNA studies demonstrate that ADAR1 knockdown impaired in vivo self-renewal capacity of blast crisis CML progenitors. Together these data provide a compelling rationale for developing ADAR1-based LSC detection and eradication strategies.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据