4.8 Article

Mutant induced pluripotent stem cell lines recapitulate aspects of TDP-43 proteinopathies and reveal cell-specific vulnerability

出版社

NATL ACAD SCIENCES
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1202922109

关键词

disease modeling; reprogramming; motor neuron disease; Lou Gehrig disease

资金

  1. Euan MacDonald Centre
  2. Fidelity Foundation
  3. Motor Neurone Disease Association
  4. Medical Research Council
  5. Wellcome Trust
  6. Heaton-Ellis Trust
  7. BBSRC
  8. ALS Association
  9. Rodenberry Stem Cell Program
  10. Hellman Family Foundation
  11. National Institutes of Neurological Disease and Stroke
  12. National Institutes on Aging
  13. MRC [G0300329, G0900688, MC_G1000733, G0902044, G0500289] Funding Source: UKRI
  14. Medical Research Council [G0500289B, G0900688, MC_G1000733, G0300329, G0902044, G0700711B, G0500289] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Transactive response DNA-binding (TDP-43) protein is the dominant disease protein in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) and a subgroup of frontotemporal lobar degeneration (FTLD-TDP). Identification of mutations in the gene encoding TDP-43 (TARDBP) in familial ALS confirms a mechanistic link between misaccumulation of TDP-43 and neurodegeneration and provides an opportunity to study TDP-43 proteinopathies in human neurons generated from patient fibroblasts by using induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs). Here, we report the generation of iPSCs that carry the TDP-43 M337V mutation and their differentiation into neurons and functional motor neurons. Mutant neurons had elevated levels of soluble and detergent-resistant TDP-43 protein, decreased survival in longitudinal studies, and increased vulnerability to antagonism of the PI3K pathway. We conclude that expression of physiological levels of TDP-43 in human neurons is sufficient to reveal a mutation-specific cell-autonomous phenotype and strongly supports this approach for the study of disease mechanisms and for drug screening.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据