4.8 Article

Crystal structure of LpxK, the 4′-kinase of lipid A biosynthesis and atypical P-loop kinase functioning at the membrane interface

出版社

NATL ACAD SCIENCES
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1206072109

关键词

lipid metabolism; endotoxin; integral monotopic protein; Walker motif

资金

  1. US Department of Energy, Office of Science, and the Office of Basic Energy Sciences [W-31-109-Eng-38]
  2. National Institutes of Health Grant [GM-51310]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In Gram-negative bacteria, the hydrophobic anchor of the outer membrane lipopolysaccharide is lipid A, a saccharolipid that plays key roles in both viability and pathogenicity of these organisms. The tetraacyldisaccharide 4'-kinase (LpxK) of the diverse P-loop-containing nucleoside triphosphate hydrolase superfamily catalyzes the sixth step in the biosynthetic pathway of lipid A, and is the only known P-loop kinase to act upon a lipid substrate at the membrane. Here, we report the crystal structures of apo- and ADP/Mg2+- bound forms of Aquifex aeolicus LpxK to a resolution of 1.9 angstrom and 2.2 angstrom, respectively. LpxK consists of two alpha/beta/alpha sandwich domains connected by a two-stranded beta-sheet linker. The N-terminal domain, which has most structural homology to other family members, is responsible for catalysis at the P-loop and positioning of the disaccharide-1-phosphate substrate for phosphoryl transfer on the inner membrane. The smaller C-terminal domain, a substructure unique to LpxK, helps bind the nucleotide substrate and Mg2+ cation using a 25 degrees hinge motion about its base. Activity was severely reduced in alanine point mutants of conserved residues D138 and D139, which are not directly involved in ADP or Mg2+ binding in our structures, indicating possible roles in phosphoryl acceptor positioning or catalysis. Combined structural and kinetic studies have led to an increased understanding of the enzymatic mechanism of LpxK and provided the framework for structure-based antimicrobial design.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据