4.8 Article

A gradient of childhood self-control predicts health, wealth, and public safety

出版社

NATL ACAD SCIENCES
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1010076108

关键词

life course; longitudinal; public policy

资金

  1. US National Institute on Aging [AG032282, 2AG21178]
  2. National Institute of Mental Health [MH077874]
  3. National Institute of Child Health and Human Development [HD061298]
  4. National Institute of Dental and Craniofacial Research [DE015260]
  5. National Institute on Drug Abuse [DA023026]
  6. UK Medical Research Council [G0100527, G0601483]
  7. Economic and Social Research Council [RES-177-25-0013]
  8. New Zealand Health Research Council
  9. Hebrew University
  10. Jacobs Foundation
  11. UK Department of Health
  12. Royal Society
  13. Economic and Social Research Council [ES/H034897/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  14. Medical Research Council [G9817803B, G0601483, G1002190, G9806489, G0100527] Funding Source: researchfish
  15. ESRC [ES/H034897/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  16. MRC [G9806489, G0100527, G1002190, G0601483] Funding Source: UKRI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Policy-makers are considering large-scale programs aimed at self-control to improve citizens' health and wealth and reduce crime. Experimental and economic studies suggest such programs could reap benefits. Yet, is self-control important for the health, wealth, and public safety of the population? Following a cohort of 1,000 children from birth to the age of 32 y, we show that childhood self-control predicts physical health, substance dependence, personal finances, and criminal offending outcomes, following a gradient of self-control. Effects of children's self-control could be disentangled from their intelligence and social class as well as from mistakes they made as adolescents. In another cohort of 500 sibling-pairs, the sibling with lower self-control had poorer outcomes, despite shared family background. Interventions addressing self-control might reduce a panoply of societal costs, save taxpayers money, and promote prosperity.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据