4.8 Article

Global food demand and the sustainable intensification of agriculture

出版社

NATL ACAD SCIENCES
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1116437108

关键词

food security; land-use change; biodiversity; climate change; soil fertility

资金

  1. National Science Foundation [DEB-0620652]
  2. University of Minnesota Institute on the Environment

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Global food demand is increasing rapidly, as are the environmental impacts of agricultural expansion. Here, we project global demand for crop production in 2050 and evaluate the environmental impacts of alternative ways that this demand might be met. We find that per capita demand for crops, when measured as caloric or protein content of all crops combined, has been a similarly increasing function of per capita real income since 1960. This relationship forecasts a 100-110% increase in global crop demand from 2005 to 2050. Quantitative assessments show that the environmental impacts of meeting this demand depend on how global agriculture expands. If current trends of greater agricultural intensification in richer nations and greater land clearing (extensification) in poorer nations were to continue, similar to 1 billion ha of land would be cleared globally by 2050, with CO2-C equivalent greenhouse gas emissions reaching similar to 3 Gt y(-1) and N use similar to 250 Mt y(-1) by then. In contrast, if 2050 crop demand was met by moderate intensification focused on existing croplands of underyielding nations, adaptation and transfer of high-yielding technologies to these croplands, and global technological improvements, our analyses forecast land clearing of only similar to 0.2 billion ha, greenhouse gas emissions of similar to 1 Gt y(-1), and global N use of similar to 225 Mt y(-1). Efficient management practices could substantially lower nitrogen use. Attainment of high yields on existing croplands of underyielding nations is of great importance if global crop demand is to be met with minimal environmental impacts.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据