4.8 Article

An ATP-binding cassette transporter-like complex governs cell-wall hydrolysis at the bacterial cytokinetic ring

出版社

NATL ACAD SCIENCES
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1107780108

关键词

morphogenesis; peptidoglycan; cell division; cell envelope

资金

  1. Massachusetts Life Science Center
  2. Burroughs Wellcome Fund
  3. National Institutes of Health [R01 AI083365]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

ATP-binding cassette transporters are ubiquitous membrane protein complexes that move substrates across membranes. They do so using ATP-induced conformational changes in their nucleotide-binding domains to alter the conformation of the transport cavity formed by their transmembrane domains. In Escherichia coli, an ATP-binding cassette transporter-like complex composed of FtsE (nucleotide-binding domain) and FtsX (transmembrane domain) has long been known to be important for cytokinesis, but its role in the process has remained mysterious. Here we identify FtsEX as a regulator of cell-wall hydrolysis at the division site. Cell-wall material synthesized by the division machinery is shared initially by daughter cells and must be split by hydrolytic enzymes called amidases to drive daughter-cell separation. We recently showed that the amidases require activation at the cytokinetic ring by proteins with LytM domains, of which EnvC is the most critical. In this report, we demonstrate that FtsEX directly recruits EnvC to the septum via an interaction between EnvC and a periplasmic loop of FtsX. Importantly, we also show that FtsEX variants predicted to be ATPase defective still recruit EnvC to the septum but fail to promote cell separation. Our results thus suggest that amidase activation via EnvC in the periplasm is regulated by conformational changes in the FtsEX complex mediated by ATP hydrolysis in the cytoplasm. Since FtsE has been reported to interact with the tubulin-like FtsZ protein, our model provides a potential mechanism for coupling amidase activity with the contraction of the FtsZ cytoskeletal ring.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据