4.8 Article

Polymorphic family of injected pseudokinases is paramount in Toxoplasma virulence

出版社

NATL ACAD SCIENCES
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1015980108

关键词

copy number variation; host-pathogen interaction

资金

  1. American Cancer Society
  2. National Research Service Award
  3. California Universitywide AIDS Research
  4. National Institutes of Health [AI73756, K22AI080977]
  5. Pew Scholarship in the Biomedical Sciences

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Toxoplasma gondii, an obligate intracellular parasite of the phylum Apicomplexa, has the unusual ability to infect virtually any warm-blooded animal. It is an extraordinarily successful parasite, infecting an estimated 30% of humans worldwide. The outcome of Toxoplasma infection is highly dependent on allelic differences in the large number of effectors that the parasite secretes into the host cell. Here, we show that the largest determinant of the virulence difference between two of the most common strains of Toxoplasma is the ROP5 locus. This is an unusual segment of the Toxoplasma genome consisting of a family of 4-10 tandem, highly divergent genes encoding pseudokinases that are injected directly into host cells. Given their hypothesized catalytic inactivity, it is striking that deletion of the ROP5 cluster in a highly virulent strain caused a complete loss of virulence, showing that ROP5 proteins are, in fact, indispensable for Toxoplasma to cause disease in mice. We find that copy number at this locus varies among the three major Toxoplasma lineages and that extensive polymorphism is clustered into hotspots within the ROP5 pseudokinase domain. We propose that the ROP5 locus represents an unusual evolutionary strategy for sampling of sequence space in which the gene encoding an important enzyme has been (i) catalytically inactivated, (ii) expanded in number, and (iii) subject to strong positive selection. Such a strategy likely contributes to Toxoplasma's successful adaptation to a wide host range and has resulted in dramatic differences in virulence.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据