4.8 Article

Cell-cell communication mimicry with poly(ethylene glycol) hydrogels for enhancing β-cell function

出版社

NATL ACAD SCIENCES
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1014026108

关键词

tissue engineering; cell encapsulation

资金

  1. Howard Hughes Medical Institute
  2. National Institutes of Health [R01DK076084]
  3. Colorado Clinical and Translational Sciences Institute
  4. Indiana University-Purdue University at Indianapolis

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A biomimetic hydrogel platform was designed to signal encapsulated cells using immobilized cell-cell communication cues, with a focus on enhancing the survival and function of encapsulated pancreatic beta-cells to treat type 1 diabetes. When MIN6 cells, a pancreatic beta-cell line, were encapsulated in poly(ethylene glycol) (PEG) hydrogels, their survival and glucose responsiveness to insulin were highly dependent on the cell-packing density. A minimum packing density of 10(7) cells/mL was necessary to maintain the survival of encapsulated beta-cells without the addition of material functionalities (e.g., cell adhesion ligands). While single cell suspensions can improve diffusion-limited mass transfer, direct cell-cell interactions are limited. Thus, thiolated EphA5-Fc receptor and ephrinA5-Fc ligand were conjugated into PEG hydrogels via a thiol-acrylate photopolymerization to render an otherwise inert PEG hydrogel bioactive. The biomimetic hydrogels presented here can provide crucial cell-cell communication signals for dispersed beta-cells and improve their survival and proliferation. Together with the cell-adhesive peptide RGDS, the immobilized fusion proteins (EphA5-Fc and ephrinA5-Fc) synergistically increased the survival of both MIN6 beta-cells and dissociated islet cells, both at a very low cell-packing density (< 2 x 10(6) cells/mL). This unique gel platform demonstrates new strategies for tailoring biomimetic environments to enhance the encapsulation of cells that require cell-cell contact to survive and function.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据