4.8 Article

Characterization of a unique [FeS] cluster in the electron transfer chain of the oxygen tolerant [NiFe] hydrogenase from Aquifex aeolicus

出版社

NATL ACAD SCIENCES
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1100610108

关键词

electrochemistry; EPR; iron-sulfur centers; O(2)-sensitivity

资金

  1. EU [SOLAR-H2, 212508]
  2. Bundesministerium fur Bildung and Forschung (BMBF) [03SF0318B, 03SF0355C]
  3. Max Planck Society
  4. CNRS
  5. French National Research Agency
  6. city of Marseilles, Region Provence-Alpes-Cote d'Azur, Pole de competitivite CapEnergies

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Iron-sulfur clusters are versatile electron transfer cofactors, ubiquitous in metalloenzymes such as hydrogenases. In the oxygen-tolerant Hydrogenase I from Aquifex aeolicus such electron wires form a relay to a diheme cytb, an integral part of a respiration pathway for the reduction of O(2) to water. Amino acid sequence comparison with oxygen-sensitive hydrogenases showed conserved binding motifs for three iron-sulfur clusters, the nature and properties of which were unknown so far. Electron paramagnetic resonance spectra exhibited complex signals that disclose interesting features and spin-coupling patterns; by redox titrations three iron-sulfur clusters were identified in their usual redox states, a [3Fe4S] and two [4Fe4S], but also a unique high-potential (HP) state was found. On the basis of (57)Fe Mossbauer spectroscopy we attribute this HP form to a superoxidized state of the [4Fe4S] center proximal to the [NiFe] site. The unique environment of this cluster, characterized by a surplus cysteine coordination, is able to tune the redox potentials and make it compliant with the [4Fe4S](3+) state. It is actually the first example of a biological [4Fe4S] center that physiologically switches between 3+, 2+, and 1+ oxidation states within a very small potential range. We suggest that the (1+ /2+) redox couple serves the classical electron transfer reaction, whereas the superoxidation step is associated with a redox switch against oxidative stress.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据