4.8 Article

T-cell triggering thresholds are modulated by the number of antigen within individual T-cell receptor clusters

出版社

NATL ACAD SCIENCES
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1018771108

关键词

cell biophysics; cell patterning; immune synapse

资金

  1. Office of Science, Office of Basic Energy Sciences, of the US Department of Energy [DE-AC02-05CH11231]
  2. Chemical Sciences, Geosciences and Biosciences Division, Office of Basic Energy Sciences, of the US Department of Energy [DE-AC03-76SF00098]
  3. National Institutes of Health [R37 AI043542]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

T cells react to extremely small numbers of activating agonist peptides. Spatial organization of T-cell receptors (TCR) and their peptide-major histocompatibility complex (pMHC) ligands into microclusters is correlated with T-cell activation. Here we have designed an experimental strategy that enables control over the number of agonist peptides per TCR cluster, without altering the total number engaged by the cell. Supported membranes, partitioned with grids of barriers to lateral mobility, provide an effective way of limiting the total number of pMHC ligands that may be assembled within a single TCR cluster. Observations directly reveal that restriction of pMHC content within individual TCR clusters can decrease T-cell sensitivity for triggering initial calcium flux at fixed total pMHC density. Further analysis suggests that triggering thresholds are determined by the number of activating ligands available to individual TCR clusters, not by the total number encountered by the cell. Results from a series of experiments in which the overall agonist density and the maximum number of agonist per TCR cluster are independently varied in primary T cells indicate that the most probable minimal triggering unit for calcium signaling is at least four pMHC in a single cluster for this system. This threshold is unchanged by inclusion of coagonist pMHC, but costimulation of CD28 by CD80 can modulate the threshold lower.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据