4.8 Article

N-terminal domain of αB-crystallin provides a conformational switch for multimerization and structural heterogeneity

出版社

NATL ACAD SCIENCES
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1014656108

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Institutes of Health (NIH) [1R01 EY017370, 2T32 GM007270, 1R01 GM079233]
  2. American Diabetes Association [1-09-CD-05]
  3. Howard Hughes Medical Institute

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The small heat shock protein (sHSP) alpha B-crystallin (alpha B) plays a key role in the cellular protection system against stress. For decades, high-resolution structural studies on heterogeneous sHSPs have been confounded by the polydisperse nature of alpha B oligomers. We present an atomic-level model of full-length alpha B as a symmetric 24-subunit multimer based on solid-state NMR, small-angle X-ray scattering (SAXS), and EM data. The model builds on our recently reported structure of the homodimeric alpha-crystallin domain (ACD) and C-terminal IXI motif in the context of the multimer. A hierarchy of interactions contributes to build multimers of varying sizes: Interactions between two ACDs define a dimer, three dimers connected by their C-terminal regions define a hexameric unit, and variable interactions involving the N-terminal region define higher-order multimers. Within a multimer, N-terminal regions exist in multiple environments, contributing to the heterogeneity observed by NMR. Analysis of SAXS data allows determination of a heterogeneity parameter for this type of system. A mechanism of multimerization into higher-order asymmetric oligomers via the addition of up to six dimeric units to a 24-mer is proposed. The proposed asymmetric multimers explain the homogeneous appearance of alpha B in negative-stain EM images and the known dynamic exchange of alpha B subunits. The model of alpha B provides a structural basis for understanding known disease-associated missense mutations and makes predictions concerning substrate binding and the reported fibrilogenesis of alpha B.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据