4.8 Article

Interplay between spontaneous and induced brain activity during human non-rapid eye movement sleep

出版社

NATL ACAD SCIENCES
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1112503108

关键词

sleep spindles; neuroimaging; fMRI; auditory perception; sleep physiology

资金

  1. Belgian Fonds National de la Recherche Scientifique (FNRS)
  2. Fondation Medicale Reine Elisabeth
  3. University of Liege
  4. Interuniversity Attraction Poles Programme-Belgian State-Belgian Science Policy
  5. European Sleep Research Society
  6. Belgian American Educational Foundation
  7. Belgian Neurological Society
  8. Fonds Leon Fredericq
  9. Horlait- Dapsens Medical Foundation
  10. Wallonie-Bruxelles International
  11. Austrian Science Fund [J2470-B02]
  12. Howard Hughes Medical Institute
  13. National Institutes of Health [R01 EB009282]
  14. Fonds Leon Fredericq (Belgium)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Humans are less responsive to the surrounding environment during sleep. However, the extent to which the human brain responds to external stimuli during sleep is uncertain. We used simultaneous EEG and functional MRI to characterize brain responses to tones during wakefulness and non-rapid eye movement (NREM) sleep. Sounds during wakefulness elicited responses in the thalamus and primary auditory cortex. These responses persisted in NREM sleep, except throughout spindles, during which they became less consistent. When sounds induced a K complex, activity in the auditory cortex was enhanced and responses in distant frontal areas were elicited, similar to the stereotypical pattern associated with slow oscillations. These data show that sound processing during NREM sleep is constrained by fundamental brain oscillatory modes (slow oscillations and spindles), which result in a complex interplay between spontaneous and induced brain activity. The distortion of sensory information at the thalamic level, especially during spindles, functionally isolates the cortex from the environment and might provide unique conditions favorable for off-line memory processing.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据