4.8 Article

Efficiency of the CO2-concentrating mechanism of diatoms

出版社

NATL ACAD SCIENCES
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1018062108

关键词

climate change; ocean acidification; phytoplankton

资金

  1. National Science Foundation [OCE-0722374, OCE-0727997]
  2. BP
  3. Ford Motor Co.
  4. [OCE-0825192]
  5. Direct For Biological Sciences
  6. Emerging Frontiers [1040965] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  7. Division Of Ocean Sciences
  8. Directorate For Geosciences [0825192] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Diatoms are responsible for a large fraction of CO2 export to deep seawater, a process responsible for low modern-day CO2 concentrations in surface seawater and the atmosphere. Like other photosynthetic organisms, diatoms have adapted to these low ambient concentrations by operating a CO2 concentrating mechanism (CCM) to elevate the concentration of CO2 at the site of fixation. We used mass spectrometric measurements of passive and active cellular carbon fluxes and model simulations of these fluxes to better understand the stoichiometric and energetic efficiency and the physiological architecture of the diatom CCM. The membranes of diatoms are highly permeable to CO2, resulting in a large diffusive exchange of CO2 between the cell and external milieu. An active transport of carbon from the cytoplasm into the chloroplast is the main driver of the diatom CCM. Only one-third of this carbon flux is fixed photosynthetically, and the rest is lost by CO2 diffusion back to the cytoplasm. Both the passive influx of CO2 from the external medium and the recycling of the CO2 leaking out of the chloroplast are achieved by the activity of a carbonic anhydrase enzyme combined with the maintenance of a low concentration of HCO3- in the cytoplasm. To achieve the CO2 concentration necessary to saturate carbon fixation, the CO2 is most likely concentrated within the pyrenoid, an organelle within the chloroplast where the CO2-fixating enzyme is located.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据