4.8 Article

Absence of keratin 8 confers a paradoxical microflora-dependent resistance to apoptosis in the colon

出版社

NATL ACAD SCIENCES
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1010833108

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Institutes of Health [R01 DK47918, K08 DK069385, DK56339, DK34933]
  2. European Union
  3. Academy of Finland
  4. Juselius Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Keratin 8 (K8) is a major intermediate filament protein present in enterocytes and serves an antiapoptotic function in hepatocytes. K8-null mice develop colonic hyperplasia and colitis that are reversed after antibiotic treatment. To investigate the pathways that underlie the mechanism of colonocyte hyperplasia and the normalization of the colonic phenotype in response to antibiotics, we performed genome-wide microarray analysis. Functional annotation of genes that are differentially regulated in K8(-/-) and K8(+/+) isolated colon crypts (colonocytes) identified apoptosis as a major altered pathway. Exposure of K8(-/-) colonocytes or colon organ (organoid) cultures, but not K8(-/-) small intestine organoid cultures, to apoptotic stimuli showed, surprisingly, that they are resistant to apoptosis compared with their wild-type counterparts. This resistance is not related to inflammation per se because T-cell receptor alpha-null (TCR-alpha(-/-)) and wild-type colon cultures respond similarly upon induction of apoptosis. Following antibiotic treatment, K8(-/-) colonocytes and organ cultures become less resistant to apoptosis and respond similarly to the wild-type colonocytes. Antibiotics also normalize most differentially up-regulated genes, including survivin and beta 4-integrin. Treatment of K8(-/-) mice with anti-beta 4-integrin antibody up-regulated survivin, and induced phosphorylation of focal adhesion kinase with decreased activation of caspases. Therefore, unlike the proapoptotic effect of K8 mutation or absence in hepatocytes, lack of K8 confers resistance to colonocyte apoptosis in a microflora-dependent manner.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据