4.8 Article

Mechanism for selectivity-inactivation coupling in KcsA potassium channels

出版社

NATL ACAD SCIENCES
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1014186108

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Institute of Health [R01-HL54171, R01-GM077560, GM088352, GM-0080]
  2. American Heart Association [0810196Z]
  3. National Science Foundation
  4. US Department of Energy, Office of Science, Office of Basic Energy Sciences [DE-AC02-98CH10886]
  5. Offices of Biological and Environmental Research and of Basic Energy Sciences of the US Department of Energy
  6. National Center for Research Resources of the National Institutes of Health

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Structures of the prokaryotic K+ channel, KcsA, highlight the role of the selectivity filter carbonyls from the GYG signature sequence in determining a highly selective pore, but channels displaying this sequence vary widely in their cation selectivity. Furthermore, variable selectivity can be found within the same channel during a process called C-type inactivation. We investigated the mechanism for changes in selectivity associated with inactivation in a model K+ channel, KcsA. We found that E71A, a noninactivating KcsA mutant in which a hydrogen-bond behind the selectivity filter is disrupted, also displays decreased K+ selectivity. In E71A channels, Na+ permeates at higher rates as seen with 86Rb(+) and 22Na(+) flux measurements and analysis of intracellular Na+ block. Crystal structures of E71A reveal that the selectivity filter no longer assumes the collapsed, presumed inactivated, conformation in low K+, but a flipped conformation, that is also observed in high K+, high Na+, and even Na+ only conditions. The data reveal the importance of the E71-D80 interaction in both favoring inactivation and maintaining high K+ selectivity. We propose a molecular mechanism by which inactivation and K+ selectivity are linked, a mechanism that may also be at work in other channels containing the canonical GYG signature sequence.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据