4.8 Article

Structural interconversions modulate activity of Escherichia coli ribonucleotide reductase

出版社

NATL ACAD SCIENCES
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1112715108

关键词

allostery; protein-protein interactions; conformational equilibria; nucleotide metabolism

资金

  1. National Science Foundation (NSF)
  2. National Institutes of Health/National Institute of General Medical Sciences (NIH/NIGMS) via NSF [DMR-0936384]
  3. NIH/National Center for Research Resources (NCRR) [RR-01646]
  4. NIH though the NCRR [RR017573]
  5. Department of Energy (DOE) [DE-AC02-05CH11231]
  6. DOE
  7. NIH/NIGMS
  8. NIH [F32GM904862, F32DK080622, T32GM08334, GM67167, GM29595]
  9. NSF [0645960]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Essential for DNA biosynthesis and repair, ribonucleotide reductases (RNRs) convert ribonucleotides to deoxyribonucleotides via radical-based chemistry. Although long known that allosteric regulation of RNR activity is vital for cell health, the molecular basis of this regulation has been enigmatic, largely due to a lack of structural information about how the catalytic subunit (alpha(2)) and the radical-generation subunit (beta(2)) interact. Here we present the first structure of a complex between alpha(2) and beta(2) subunits for the prototypic RNR from Escherichia coli. Using four techniques (small-angle X-ray scattering, X-ray crystallography, electron microscopy, and analytical ultracentrifugation), we describe an unprecedented alpha(4)beta(4) ring-like structure in the presence of the negative activity effector dATP and provide structural support for an active alpha(2)beta(2) configuration. We demonstrate that, under physiological conditions, E. coli RNR exists as a mixture of transient alpha(2)beta(2) and alpha(4)beta(4) species whose distributions are modulated by allosteric effectors. We further show that this interconversion between alpha(2)beta(2) and alpha(4)beta(4) entails dramatic subunit rearrangements, providing a stunning molecular explanation for the allosteric regulation of RNR activity in E. coli.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据