4.8 Article

High Tc electron doped Ca10(Pt3As8)(Fe2As2)5 and Ca10(Pt4As8)(Fe2As2)5 superconductors with skutterudite intermediary layers

出版社

NATL ACAD SCIENCES
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1110563108

关键词

-

资金

  1. Air Force Office of Scientific Research Multidisciplinary Research Program for University Research Initiative on superconductivity
  2. National Science Foundation [0922931]
  3. Direct For Mathematical & Physical Scien [0922931] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  4. Division Of Chemistry [0922931] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

It has been argued that the very high transition temperatures of the highest T-c cuprate superconductors are facilitated by enhanced CuO2 plane coupling through heavy metal oxide intermediary layers. Whether enhanced coupling through intermediary layers can also influence T-c in the new high T-c iron arsenide superconductors has never been tested due the lack of appropriate systems for study. Here we report the crystal structures and properties of two iron arsenide superconductors, Ca-10(Pt3As8)(Fe2As2)(5) (the 10-3-8 phase) and Ca-10(Pt4As8)(Fe2As2)(5) (the 10-4-8 phase). Based on -Ca-(PtnAs8)-Ca-Fe2As2-layer stacking, these are very similar compounds for which the most important differences lie in the structural and electronic characteristics of the intermediary platinum arsenide layers. Electron doping through partial substitution of Pt for Fe in the FeAs layers leads to T-c of 11 K in the 10-3-8 phase and 26 K in the 10-4-8 phase. The often- cited empirical rule in the arsenide superconductor literature relating T-c to As-Fe-As bond angles does not explain the observed differences in T-c of the two phases; rather, comparison suggests the presence of stronger FeAs interlayer coupling in the 10-4-8 phase arising from the twochannel interlayer interactions and the metallic nature of its intermediary Pt4As8 layer. The interlayer coupling is thus revealed as important in enhancing T-c in the iron pnictide superconductors.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据