4.8 Article

High-resolution, noninvasive longitudinal live imaging of immune responses

出版社

NATL ACAD SCIENCES
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1105002108

关键词

-

资金

  1. Diabetes Research Institute Foundation
  2. National Institutes of Health/National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases/National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases [5U19AI050864-10, 1F32DK083226, R03DK075487, R01DK084321, U01DK089538, M01RR16587, 5U01DK70460-07, R01DK55347-IU42RR016603]
  3. General Clinical Research Center
  4. Juvenile Diabetes Research Foundation [4-2004-361, 4-2008-811, 17-2010-5]
  5. Karolinska Institutet
  6. Swedish Research Council
  7. Swedish Diabetes Foundation
  8. Family Erling-Persson Foundation
  9. Family Knut and Alice Wallenberg Foundation
  10. Skandia Insurance Company Ltd.
  11. In Vivo Imaging of Beta-cell Receptors by Applied Nano Technology [FP7-228933-2]
  12. Novo Nordisk Foundation
  13. Berth von Kantzow's Foundation
  14. Novo Nordisk Fonden [NNF11OC1014706] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Intravital imaging emerged as an indispensible tool in biological research, and a variety of imaging techniques have been developed to noninvasively monitor tissues in vivo. However, most of the current techniques lack the resolution to study events at the single-cell level. Although intravital multiphoton microscopy has addressed this limitation, the need for repeated noninvasive access to the same tissue in longitudinal in vivo studies remains largely unmet. We now report on a previously unexplored approach to study immune responses after transplantation of pancreatic islets into the anterior chamber of the mouse eye. This approach enabled (i) longitudinal, noninvasive imaging of transplanted tissues in vivo; (ii) in vivo cytolabeling to assess cellular phenotype and viability in situ; (iii) local intervention by topical application or intraocular injection; and (iv) real-time tracking of infiltrating immune cells in the target tissue.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据