4.8 Article

Autophagy protein microtubule-associated protein 1 light chain-3B (LC3B) activates extrinsic apoptosis during cigarette smoke-induced emphysema

出版社

NATL ACAD SCIENCES
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1005574107

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Institutes of Health [R01-HL60234, R01-HL55330, R01-HL079904, R01-HL090757]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is a debilitating disease caused by chronic exposure to cigarette smoke (CS), which involves airway obstruction and alveolar loss (i.e., emphysema). The mechanisms of COPD pathogenesis remain unclear. Our previous studies demonstrated elevated autophagy in human COPD lung, and as a cellular and tissue response to CS exposure in an experimental model of emphysema in vivo. We identified the autophagic protein microtubule-associated protein 1 light chain-3B (LC3B) as a positive regulator of CS-induced lung epithelial cell death. We now extend these initial observations to explore the mechanism by which LC3B mediates CS-induced apoptosis and emphysema development in vivo. Here, we observed that LC3B(-/-) mice had significantly decreased levels of apoptosis in the lungs after CS exposure, and displayed resistance to CS-induced airspace enlargement, relative to WT littermate mice. We found that LC3B associated with the extrinsic apoptotic factor Fas in lipid rafts in an interaction mediated by caveolin-1 (Cav-1). The siRNA-dependent knockdown of Cav-1 sensitized epithelial cells to CS-induced apoptosis, as evidenced by enhanced death-inducing signaling complex formation and caspase activation. Furthermore, Cav-1(-/-) mice exhibited higher levels of autophagy and apoptosis in the lung in response to chronic CS exposure in vivo. In conclusion, we demonstrate a pivotal role for the autophagic protein LC3B in CS-induced apoptosis and emphysema, suggestive of novel therapeutic targets for COPD treatment. This study also introduces a mechanism by which LC3B, through interactions with Cav-1 and Fas, can regulate apoptosis.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据