4.8 Article

Social and genetic interactions drive fitness variation in a free-living dolphin population

出版社

NATL ACAD SCIENCES
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1007997107

关键词

animal model; gene-culture coevolution; social learning; reproductive success; relatedness

资金

  1. Australian Research Council [A19701144, DP0346313]
  2. W. V. Scott Foundation
  3. National Geographic Society
  4. Seaworld Research and Rescue Foundation
  5. A. H. Schultz-Stiftung
  6. Claraz-Schenkung
  7. National Science Foundation [0316800, 9753044]
  8. Georgetown University
  9. Direct For Biological Sciences
  10. Division Of Integrative Organismal Systems [0316800, 9753044] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  11. Division Of Behavioral and Cognitive Sci
  12. Direct For Social, Behav & Economic Scie [941487] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  13. Australian Research Council [DP0346313] Funding Source: Australian Research Council

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The evolutionary forces that drive fitness variation in species are of considerable interest. Despite this, the relative importance and interactions of genetic and social factors involved in the evolution of fitness traits in wild mammalian populations are largely unknown. To date, a few studies have demonstrated that fitness might be influenced by either social factors or genes in natural populations, but none have explored how the combined effect of social and genetic parameters might interact to influence fitness. Drawing from a long-term study of wild bottlenose dolphins in the eastern gulf of Shark Bay, Western Australia, we present a unique approach to understanding these interactions. Our study shows that female calving success depends on both genetic inheritance and social bonds. Moreover, we demonstrate that interactions between social and genetic factors also influence female fitness. Therefore, our study represents a major methodological advance, and provides critical insights into the interplay of genetic and social parameters of fitness.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据